Week 26 scores:
Traeth 6.0 (Man Utd)
ODM 5.5 (draw at Burnley, HT/FT X/1 at Spurs)
Slick 4.05 (West Ham, draw at Burnley)
Kegman 1.8 (Leicester)
Howson 1.62 (Morecambe)
Winrew 1.62 (Morecambe)
Rcgills 1.37 (Lincoln)
Nawoo 0
Week 26 table:
1. Howson 91.74
2. Slick 82.08
3. ODM 80.95
4. Traeth 72.91
5. Winrew 68.93
6. Rcgills 64.35
7. Nawoo 62.02
8. Kegman 50.25
9. Kristobal 19.75
10. Basher 16.56
Highest overall score: Howson 22.1pts (week 8)
Well done to Traeth for the week's highest score, from a single selection as well. Slick and ODM close the gap slightly on Howson.
As Slick mentions above, Howson has been given the same odds Winrew got for Morecambe. Just to clarify, there's no reason why two players with the same selection can't have different prices. It's happened plenty of times before. But when one player gets odds of 2.62 at midnight on Friday, and another player gets odds of 3.2 about 12 hours later, such a big change in a short time raises suspicions. All the more so when a historical odds comparison site says that the price of 3.2 hadn't been available since the Tuesday.
Players are, of course, free to take early prices, as long as they put their selections up early too (if the thread's not already been started, start one yourself, we'll adapt it afterwards). But prices posted have to be valid at the time you're posting them. You can't, for example, make a pre-selection early in the week, take a screenshot, look at the prices again at the weekend, and post up your earlier screenshot if the odds were better in that one.
And one more thing - we've discovered another potential loophole (nothing at all to suggest that anyone has exploited this, just something that we've realised is possible). From now, could players all include in their screenshots the combined odds for the 5-fold (i.e. in the screenshot below, where it says 206.32). No extra work involved, just going a little bit further down the screen in your screenshot
